[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ecf-dev] Newsreader 0.6.0
|
Hi Wim,
Wim Jongman wrote:
2a) After only a cursory examination of the code myself it looks
like the ECF provider (i.e. org.eclipse.ecf.provider.nntp) is not
completed/functioning yet...is that right? Would it be possible
to get that completed as well while the reviewing of the other
pieces is done?
Yes, I made a start already.
2b) Is there any test code available? It would be great to be
able include test code (of 2a as well as other tests) in the
initial contribution
There is some but I have failed to do some from the start. It looked
trivial in the beginning ... However, now that the 0.6.0 release is
out. This is the top priority task, together with 2a.
3) A CQ for the contribution has to be created for IP review (I
will do this, but would like to get at least some of 1 done...in
order to avoid multiple cycles of changes with the IP review process).
I don't know the IP process. Can you elaborate on why this would take
so long since I wrote 99% of the code from scratch.
Since you wrote the code, and it's under EPL it won't take long...once
they actually get to it...but there is a queue/backlog of CQ
requests....so that can slow things down.
4) Wim if you wish I can/will nominate you as an ECF committer, so
that you can more easily add to/extend/maintain the contribution.
Following EF rules, it will *still* be necessary for 3 to be done
for this contribution, but for the future, having you be a
committer would allow you to update/fix/extend things without CQs
to do so.
Yes, thanks.
Ok. I'll initiate the election in a few days. Wim if you would be able
to provide/post a short background on yourself for the existing
committers...and/or point to something online...that would be good (only
since not everyone will be able to review the newsreader code and the
committers will need some info about you...your technical background,
what you are/have been using ECF for, your interests, what other open
source work you have done/are doing).
Thanks,
Scott