[ecf-dev] Tracing

["Konradi, Philipp" <philipp.konradi@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Also, there are trace options for the discovery and distribution
impls.
> Unfortunately, we accidently left the .options files out of the
bundles
> for the 3.0 build, but they are/will be in the target bundles for 3.1.
I've stumbled upon this right now :-)
Would be great if those could be added to the current daily builds. I
could also fix it, just let me know which build files need to be
adjusted.

Regards, 
Philipp

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ecf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Scott Lewis
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 4:21 AM
> To: Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list.
> Subject: Re: [ecf-dev] ECF 3.1 download?
> 
> Hi Bryan,
> 
> For debugging purposes, you may wish to register your own
> implementations of the following services:
> 
> Discovery listeners
> org.eclipse.ecf.osgi.services.discovery.IHostDiscoveryListener
> org.eclipse.ecf.osgi.services.discovery.IProxyDiscoveryListener
> 
> Distribution Listeners
> org.eclipse.ecf.osgi.services.distribution.IHostDistributionListener
> org.eclipse.ecf.osgi.services.distribution.IProxyDistributionListener
> 
> If you register an implementer of these listeners as a service, then
at
> runtime they will be notified (on the host and proxy processes,
> respectively), when the various steps in the discovery/distribution
> process occur.
> 
> Also, there are trace options for the discovery and distribution
impls.
> Unfortunately, we accidently left the .options files out of the
bundles
> for the 3.0 build, but they are/will be in the target bundles for 3.1.
> 
> 
> Scott
> 
> 
> Bryan Hunt wrote:
> > HI Scott,
> >
> > I'm using r-OSGi with my own discovery provider as I'm deploying
> > services on a WAN.  What I know so far is that the server seems to
> > advertise the services I expect, the client connects to the
discovery
> > provider and gets the list of services from my provider,  and after
> > that, things go badly.  I might be able to give you more info later
> > tonight, and if not, hopefully tomorrow.
> >
> > Bryan
> >
> > On Sep 13, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Scott Lewis wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Bryan,
> >>
> >> Bryan Hunt wrote:
> >>> Hi Scott,
> >>>
> >>> It turned out that one of the fixes I was looking for was already
> in
> >>> my target platform.
> >>>
> >>> I'm having a lot of problems with RFC119 - I'm getting errors when
> >>> the client discovers remote services.  I'll be diving into the
> >>> problems in the next day or two and opening bugs as I figure out
> >>> what is really going wrong.
> >>
> >> Ok...I would expect the crucial info is likely to be
> >>
> >> a) what discovery provider you are using and what your network
> >> environment is for that discovery protocol;
> >> b) what remote services provider you are using (e.g. r-OSGi, ECF
> >> generic, JMS/ActiveMQ, etc).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Scott
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ecf-dev mailing list
> >> ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ecf-dev mailing list
> > ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ecf-dev mailing list
> ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev