[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [ecf-dev] Re: [riena-dev] Riena Update
|
Hi Jan,
thanks. So that would mean you have a connected socket between the
various spaces all the time. So the point from the discussion with
Scott that I think that this make R-OSGi a connectionoriented provider
and not a connectionless provider. I am not saying this is good or bad
here.
Like with Webservices (say SOAP or any other protocol) over HTTP its
possible to reuse a connected socket but typically you disconnect
after each call and connect for the next one.
Is that the correct assumption Jan ?
So that makes me still wonder if there is an ECF provider currently
available that is connectionless ?
cheers
christian
Am 13.01.2009 um 16:28 schrieb Rellermeyer Jan Simon:
Hi Christian,
that's true. You create a mesh of point-to-point connections to
define your remote service space. Once you have done that, you can
access the remote services over this mesh without creating new
dedicated connections.
Cheers,
Jan
------------------------------------------------------------
MSc Jan S. Rellermeyer, Systems Group, Department of Computer
Science, ETH Zurich
IFW B 47.1, Haldeneggsteig 4, CH-8092 Zürich, Switzerland
http://www.systems.ethz.ch
------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: ecf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ecf-dev-
bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Christian Campo
Sent: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009 09:05
To: Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list.
Cc: Riena Developers list
Subject: Re: [ecf-dev] Re: [riena-dev] Riena Update
Hi Scott,
Thanks for your comments. I have a question about them. You
classify r-
osgi as a connection-less provider. I remember that in r-osgi you
connect a client container with a server container and that will then
trigger some dynamic service proxies to be generated on the client
container.
My assumption was that this initial connection is held and also used
for the remote service invocation calls itself. Is that an incorrect
assumption ? Maybe somebody like you or Jan could clarify that for
me.
thanks
christian
Am 13.01.2009 um 02:22 schrieb Scott Lewis:
Hi Rieners,
As discussed a week or so ago with Christian, I've produced some
comments about the previously published Riena RemoteServices Goals
on a
separate page here:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Comments_on_the_Riena_Project_Goals_and_Relatio
nship_to_ECF_project
I placed a link at to the comments at the bottom of the associated
Riena
RemoteServices page
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Riena_RemoteServices
If more/other/detail or further discussion is desired about
anything,
please let me and others know (on this mailing list and ecf-dev
mailing
list).
Thanks,
Scott
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev