Re: [ecf-dev] ECF Application -- Your input requested

[Chris Aniszczyk <zx@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Jeff may want to comment further, but I think we should strive to get comments net in Orbit (http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.orbit/?cvsroot=Tools_Project)

Jeff, what's the process to get something into Orbit?

Cheers,

---
Chris Aniszczyk | IBM Lotus | Eclipse Committer | +1 860 839 2465

Jeff McAffer ---11/07/2006 09:01:48 PM---Just want to clarify that all projects must submit a contribution questionaire when using a third party library regardless of w

From:	Jeff McAffer <Jeff_McAffer@xxxxxxxxxx>
To:	"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	11/07/2006 09:01 PM
Subject:	Re: [ecf-dev] ECF Application -- Your input requested

---

Just want to clarify that all projects must submit a contribution questionaire when using a third party library regardless of whether or not the lib has been approved for use in another project.  It is generally faster/easier for the subsequent projects but you still have to go through IPzilla 

Jeff

"Remy Suen" <remy.suen@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: ecf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/07/2006 07:20 PM

Please respond to
"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	"Eclipse Communication Framework (ECF) developer mailing list." <ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [ecf-dev] ECF Application -- Your input requested

Hi Javier,

The package Jakarta Commons-Net is being used by the Target Management project  of the Device Software Development Platform. 
It is already available as an Eclipse plugin from the DSDP CVS repository ( http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.tm.core/thirdparty/org.apache.commons.net/?cvsroot=DSDP_Project) 

It could be useful, since this package has been already approved by Eclipse. 

I had totally forgot about this since I noticed several ftp stack traces that were being filed as bugs in Bugzilla were listing Apache's commons library. TM's RSE component is using the commons library for FTP, right? Are there any particular reasons as to why org.eclipse.ftp from Platform Team is not being used? Could you provide a pros/cons comparison of some sort?

Much thanks.

Regards,
Rem_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev
_______________________________________________
ecf-dev mailing list
ecf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ecf-dev