Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
[dtp-dev] Re: SQL Execution Plan ...


Hi,

When designing and implementing this part, we assume that the input is string, that is what I call "raw data" ( not row data). Since the "raw data" is defined as a literal string, it must be a limitation for the consumer. Without this assumption, we can not implement the import/export capabilities of Execution Plan View.

As to the tree-structure graphic plan part, currently we depend on draw2d. It will be better to use GEF, but that needs time and resource, I suppose we will swtich to GEF in the future, but thanks so much for your good suggestion.


Best Regards & Wishes

Idull

Sybase China.
S/W Eng - Dev
Tel:0086-021-68799918-3102



Vasantha Jayakumar <vasantha@xxxxxxxxxx>

09/26/2006 04:41 AM

To
Da-fan.Yang@xxxxxxxxxx, jograham@xxxxxxxxxx
cc
dtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
SQL Execution Plan ...






Hi


I reviewed the draft design plan for the SQL Execution Plan and I have a couple of questions regarding this.


1. For the "Tree-structure graphic execution plan", I was wondering if we could instead use GEF here and use the TreeEditPart to define the tree structure?


2. The input to the SQL Execution Plan mentioned in the draft is "row data" which refers to the actual catalog rows. How would we go about standarizing the format of this input? For example, would we specify the minimum set of data fields to be included in the row data? If so, we would need to include this in the design.


3. For the input format to the SQL Execution plan, does anyone have requirements to use different types of input other than row data?


I appreciate your help with this.


Thanks,

-Vasantha



Back to the top