Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [Dltk-dev] heredoc scanner help


  hrm - the change didn't make its way into the git repository, which i just tried to clone.

  do i need to do something special to cause that to occur?

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Jae Gangemi <jgangemi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

  all checked in!


On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Alexey Panchenko <alex.panchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I hope to make it over the weekend or on Monday.
So, take your time :-)

On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:10 AM, Jae Gangemi <jgangemi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>   i got held up on something today so i didn't get a chance to finish off
> the partition rule.
>
>   if you can hold off one more day on the 4.0 release, that would be
> awesome, but i understand if it can't be done - there's always 4.0.1 :)
>
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Jae Gangemi <jgangemi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>   yes, it's safe - 3 of the classes are brand new and rather then change
>> the ScriptPresentationReconciler so it knows the heredoc partition is
>> supported, i just created a separate subclass of it.
>>
>>   do you know when you're going to cut the actual 4.0 release? i still
>> have to fix a minor bug in the partitioning rule itself, but i should have
>> that done and everything cleaned up by the end of the day.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Alexey Panchenko
>> <alex.panchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jae,
>>>
>>> CVS is in use still.
>>> How is your change affecting the current code? Is it safe?
>>> I would like to make 4.0 release for Juno these days, so would like to
>>> avoid unsafe changes.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Jae Gangemi <jgangemi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > hello all -
>>> >
>>> >   after much trail and error (mostly error), i finally have a working
>>> > heredoc partitioning properly working.
>>> >
>>> >   rather then touch any 'core' dltk classes (well, actually, only the
>>> > ScriptPresentationReconciler implementation needs to change, everything
>>> > else
>>> > is new code) i've created a
>>> >
>>> >     org.eclipse.dltk.ui.text.heredoc
>>> >
>>> >   namespace to place them in.
>>> >
>>> >   i haven't gone through and made the switch over to git yet - can i
>>> > still
>>> > commit this to cvs or do i need to switch first?
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > -jae
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > dltk-dev mailing list
>>> > dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dltk-dev mailing list
>>> dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -jae
>
>
>
>
> --
> -jae
>
> _______________________________________________
> dltk-dev mailing list
> dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev



--
-jae



--
-jae

Back to the top