On Sep 22, 2008, at 06:47AM, Alex Panchenko wrote:
Shelby,
I had an idea on the weekend how the performance could be fixed, so I
have committed it.
Regards,
Alex
Shelby Sanders wrote:
Alex,
Oh, OK. Sorry, I didn't pay enough attention to the subject.
Yes, I'll definitely take a look, next week. It kind of makes sense
that that is showing up as a hotspot now, because I added a bunch of
Type Reference scenarios.
Thank You,
Shelby Sanders
On Sep 19, 2008, at 05:22PM, Alex Panchenko wrote:
Shelby,
Probably my message was not clear enough (it was late here when I
have written the message).
The name of the problem class is in the subject. It is used in
different places. I have just noticed the long operations when they
are performed in the UI thread - e.g. saving the file. Please see the
lines where I have measured the save time:
---
src/org/eclipse/dltk/internal/ui/editor/SourceModuleDocumentProvider.java
18 Sep 2008 09:20:02 -0000 1.32
+++
src/org/eclipse/dltk/internal/ui/editor/SourceModuleDocumentProvider.java
20 Sep 2008 00:09:57 -0000
@@ -1356,8 +1356,11 @@
protected void
execute(IProgressMonitor monitor)
throws CoreException {
+ final long start =
System.currentTimeMillis();
commitWorkingCopy(monitor,
element,
(SourceModuleInfo) info, overwrite);
+
System.out.println("commitWorkingCopy "
+ +
(System.currentTimeMillis() - start));
}
For tests I have used the tk.rb file from standard ruby library.
It is ~135k, so I have doubled its content to get file of the 270k size.
Regards,
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shelby Sanders" <ssanders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "DLTK Developer Discussions" <dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2008 1:50:38 AM GMT +06:00 Almaty,
Novosibirsk
Subject: Re: [Dltk-dev] RubySourceElementRequestor
Alex,
Could this be caused by the recent changes in ScriptEditor?
Thank You,
Shelby Sanders
On Sep 19, 2008, at 09:44AM, Alex Panchenko wrote:
Hi All,
To Shelby Sanders:
I am testing how the ruby editor operates with large files - I have
done testing on 270Kb file.
There is 9 times slowdown from this class compared to the previous
version of it.
Do you have plans to optimize the latest changes?
Thanks,
Alex
_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
