Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [dataspace-wg-spec] [BALLOT] Approval to Create the Eclipse Data Rights Policies and Profiles (DRP) Specification Project

I declare this ballot complete and approved. Consider this also the result's report to the EMO.

The summary of the votes is below.

RepresentativeRepresentingVote
Guillaume MichaudAmadeus+1
Jim MarinoCatena-X+1
Julia PampusFraunhofer-Gesellschaft+1
Ulrich AhleGaia-X+1
Sebastian SteinbussInternational Data Spaces Association+1
Rajiv RajaniiSHARE+1
Peter KoenMicrosoft+1
Philipp ReuschT-Systems+1
Total
8

The EMO will proceed with project creation (we'll fix that reference "s/data spaces/dataspaces/").

Thanks for your attention in this matter.

Wayne

On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 2:14 PM Eclipse Management Office EMO <emo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Specification Committee,

My apologies for the earlier false start. We're restarting this ballot with understanding that the steering committee has given their approval to proceed.

Your vote is required to approve the creation of the Eclipse Data Rights Policies and Profiles (DRP) Specification Project with the following scope:

The Eclipse Data Rights policies profile provides a set of specifications designed to facilitate interoperable trust between entities that comply with Trust Frameworks and data spaces requirements. These specifications define the schemas  required for entities to identify and authenticate each other to share/access data based on the authorisations given by the data rights holder.

The project proposal can be found here: https://projects.eclipse.org/proposals/eclipse-data-rights-policies-and-profiles-drp

Per the Eclipse Foundation Specification Process, this will be a seven day ballot, ending on Thursday July 18 2024 that requires a super-majority positive vote of the Dataspace Working Group specification committee members (note that there is no veto). Community input is welcome, but only votes cast by specification committee representatives will be counted.

Specification committee representatives, your vote is hereby requested. Please respond with +1 (positive), +0 (abstain), or -1 (reject). Any feedback that you can provide to support your vote will be appreciated.

Thanks,

Wayne
--
The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation




--
The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation



Back to the top