Re: [cu-dev] [jakartaee-platform-dev] Service release approach has been

[Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am confused with the PR (https://github.com/jakartaee/concurrency/pull/259) as they directly exclude tests. The exceptions made for the Concurrency tcks are to permit the same tests to be updated so that they can work for both web profile packaged as .war and full packaged as .ear. Kyle Aure from IBM will go ahead to do a PR to address the test concerns with some guidance from Nathan instead of directly excluding tests. If excluding tests is the approach, no exception should be asked in the first place.

Thanks

Emily

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:18 AM <cu-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Your message has been rejected, probably because you are not
subscribed to the mailing list and the list's policy is to prohibit
non-members from posting to it.  If you think that your messages are
being rejected in error, contact the mailing list owner at
cu-dev-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx.




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Emily Jiang <emijiang6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: cu developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Bcc: 
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 11:17:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [cu-dev] Service release approach has been approved

I am confused with the PR (https://github.com/jakartaee/concurrency/pull/259) as they directly exclude tests. The exceptions made for the Concurrency tcks are to permit the same tests to be updated so that they can work for both web profile packaged as .war and full packaged as .ear. Kyle Aure from IBM will go ahead to do a PR to address the test concerns with some guidance from Nathan instead of directly excluding tests. If excluding tests is the approach, no exception should be asked in the first place.

Thanks

Emily

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:56 AM arjan tijms <arjan.tijms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 11:21 AM Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I think the next step is to release the 3.0.2 TCK to https://download.eclipse.org/jakartaee/concurrency/3.0 and for that to be tested with GlassFish (Web Profile + Full Platform).

A quick local run with GlassFish Web Profile with the suite-web.xml was successful:

===============================================

jakarta-concurrency

Total tests run: 100, Passes: 100, Failures: 0, Skips: 0

===============================================

We do need to adjust the runner in the Jakarta TCK project to use another suite.xml file instead of using the exclude-groups feature.

Kind regards,

Arjan Tijms

 

Scott

 

Steve

 

From: jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Scott Stark
Sent: 27 July 2022 17:22
To: cu developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>; jakartaee-platform developer discussions <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [jakartaee-platform-dev] Service release approach has been approved

 

The Specification Committee has approved an exception to the TCK process to be able to change tests in a service release for the current issue to resolve that inability of the TCK to run in the Web Profile.

_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev

--

Thanks
Emily

--

Thanks
Emily