It's great to see implementations be mindful of creating names distinct from the Specifications themselves. Big applause. I only question if we want spec project lists being used by implementations like this.
Is there already an Eclipse project for the "Concurrency RI" that is separate from the Jakarta Currency project and committers?
If there is a separate project, this conversation should likely be moved to that list. If not, we should create that project and let those committers decide.
-David
Hi,
The implementation project for Jakarta Concurrency is now called "Concurrency RI". We previously decided to not have former RI projects call themselves an RI or anything hinting at that.
I've created this issue for that, but nothing much happened yet:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-ri/issues/49
I did a name proposal there now: "SynchronicityX"
Thoughts?
Kind regards, Arjan Tijms
_______________________________________________ cu-dev mailing list cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxTo unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev
|