| Re: [cu-dev] Concurrency 3.0 pulls ready for review: #38, #40, #46, #100, #101, #143, #144 |
Issue #40Completion
stages backed by ManagedExecutorService
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/104
Issue #100ContextService
methods for contextualizing individual dependent stage actions
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/138
Issue #101Completion
stages backed by a ContextService
pull (also contains the commit for #100 which is a prereq due to references
made in JavaDoc): https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/139
commit that is unique to this pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/139/commits/ba9c817de5e47c4a32ee40c6bd46d97dcb3eea0e
Issue #38Define
Concurrency Resources Portably
This pull is the first step - getting the annotations defined with the
most basic attributes.
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/141
Issue #46Parallel
Stream Support
The most I can see doing for this one is to have ManagedThreadFactory also
implement ForkJoinWorkerThreadFactory. Alternatively, we could do
nothing and leave it to the user to implement something similar based on
ContextService.
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/140
Issue
#35Java SE 8 Date and Time Support
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/143
Issue
#99Cron-based Trigger
This builds on the Java SE Date/Time based trigger (#35 above) so it also
includes the commit for it.
commit that is unique to this pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/144/commits/8cec1222b66ea6ff68a730d1923fc7355592efe2
Hi,
I will get my team to review. I’m also trying to push to get more feedback and involvement from others through a number of JUG talks and Jakarta tech talks. I’d like to get together a team that is interested in driving this forward in the Jakarta EE 10 timeframe.
I think it would be good to also have a co-project lead so I don’t feel the burden to drive the specification falls to me. @Nathan would you be interested in being a co-project lead?
Steve
From:cu-dev <cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Nathan Rauh
Sent: 09 August 2021 22:31
To: cu developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [cu-dev] Concurrency 3.0 pulls ready for review: #38, #40,
#46, #100, #101
Now
that we are at a point where we can start making updates for Jakarta EE
10, could specification participants review the 5 pulls for the Concurrency
3.0 planned items below (whichever you are comfortable with reviewing)
and make comments in them regarding any changes that are needed or otherwise
approve them for merging? Thanks!
Issue #40Completion
stages backed by ManagedExecutorService
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/104
Issue #100ContextService
methods for contextualizing individual dependent stage actions
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/138
Issue #101Completion
stages backed by a ContextService
pull (also contains the commit for #100 which is a prereq due to references
made in JavaDoc): https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/139
commit that is unique to this pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/139/commits/ba9c817de5e47c4a32ee40c6bd46d97dcb3eea0e
Issue #38Define
Concurrency Resources Portably
This pull is the first step - getting the annotations defined with the
most basic attributes.
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/141
Issue #46Parallel
Stream Support
The most I can see doing for this one is to have ManagedThreadFactory also
implement ForkJoinWorkerThreadFactory. Alternatively, we could do
nothing and leave it to the user to implement something similar based on
ContextService.
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/140
From: Nathan
Rauh/Rochester/IBM
To: cu
developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05/10/2021
04:29 PM
Subject: Ready
for review: #38, #40, #46, #100, #101
In addition to the 3 pulls that I mentioned previously (forwarded) for
bringing over MicroProfile API,
the following 2 pulls are also ready for review:
Issue #38Define
Concurrency Resources Portably
This pull is the first step - getting the annotations defined with the
most basic attributes.
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/141
Issue #46Parallel
Stream Support
The most I can see doing for this one is to have ManagedThreadFactory also
implement ForkJoinWorkerThreadFactory. Alternatively, we could do
nothing and leave it to the user to implement something similar based on
ContextService.
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/140
see below for 3 additional pulls to copy over MicroProfile API,
----- Forwarded by Nathan Rauh/Rochester/IBM on 05/10/2021 04:11 PM -----
From: Nathan
Rauh/Rochester/IBM
To: cu
developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 03/31/2021
10:11 AM
Subject: Ready
for review: #40, #100, #101 for transferring over MicroProfile API to Jakarta
EE Concurrency 3.0
Given the amount of proposed content for Concurrency in Jakarta 10, I've
started putting together pulls for the MicroProfile-related enhancements
currently in the Milestone
3 list, starting
with the ones for copying over API methods around CompletionStage/CompletableFuture.
The following 3 are ready to start reviewing now (I won't actually
be merging anything until after the release plan is official, and of course
pending approval from the community)
When reviewing these, it will be helpful to note that MicroProfile class
ManagedExecutor is the equivalent of our ManagedExecutorService,
and MicroProfile class ThreadContext is the equivalent of our ContextService.
The method signatures themselves are an exact copy (which will be great
for compatibility), except for the one place where MicroProfile's ManagedExecutor
has a getThreadContext method that returns a ThreadContext, which is switched
to ContextService. The intent behind the MicroProfile method here is so
that threadContext/contextService.withContextCapture(completionStage/completableFuture)
can create CompletionStage/CompletableFuture proxies that are backed by
the ManagedExecutor. But managedExecutor[Service].copy(completionStage/completableFuture)
can already do that. We can decide if the equivalent getContextService
method is really wanted/needed here, and if not, I can remove it. To
start out with, I included it in the pull so that you have the opportunity
to see what it would look like if we did include it. Please add your feedback
on it in the review. I would be happy with either outcome and will
go with the majority on it.
Issue #40Completion
stages backed by ManagedExecutorService
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/104
Issue #100ContextService
methods for contextualizing individual dependent stage actions
pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/138
Issue #101Completion
stages backed by a ContextService
pull (also contains the commit for #100 which is a prereq due to references
made in JavaDoc): https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/139
commit that is unique to this pull to review:
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/concurrency-api/pull/139/commits/ba9c817de5e47c4a32ee40c6bd46d97dcb3eea0e
_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev