[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [cu-dev] Thoughts on attempting to move Jakarta Concurrency into Web Profile.
|
+1 to proposing it,
and we'll see where it goes from there.Is our 3.0 release
plan finalized now? It will be nice to get more of these features
written up and eventually merged.From:
Gurkan
Erdogdu <gerdogdu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>To:
cu
developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>Date:
04/22/2021
05:22 AMSubject:
[EXTERNAL]
Re: [cu-dev] Thoughts on attempting to move Jakarta Concurrency into Web
Profile.Sent
by: "cu-dev"
<cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sure. My main concern is that
duplicating the same features with different specs. As we did the same
fault in CDI (Every spec started to provide its own annotations as JSF
is one of them via MaangedBeans...) It is logical to remove EJB lite
Sure. My main concern is that duplicating the same features with different
specs. As we did the same fault in CDI (Every spec started to provide its
own annotations as JSF is one of them via MaangedBeans...)It is logical to remove EJB lite and
replacing with CU.GurkanOn 22 Apr 2021, at 13:07, Steve Millidge
(Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:Hi Gurkan, But Jakarta Concurrency
provides a bunch of basic capabilities that can be used by other specs
in the platform so for example we could have 1 @Asynchronous annotation
that could be reused and deprecate the others. Also asynch processing in
other specs could be redefined to utilise the underlying user defined ThreadFactory,
ManagedExecutors etc. Adding Jakarta Concurrency to Web Profile could then
enable removal of EJB lite if desired. I think this would
make the platform more unified. Steve From: cu-dev
<cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Gurkan Erdogdu
Sent: 22 April 2021 10:46
To: cu developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cu-dev] Thoughts on attempting to move Jakarta Concurrency
into Web Profile.
Hi
Steve
I
am not favor of adding another spec to Web or Core profile. It already
includes EJB lite container which provides the similar features.
For me, we can even remove the EJB lite from web profile.
Regards.
Gurkan
On
22 Apr 2021, at 11:45, Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
All,
I’m
thinking of raising an issue on the platform project to get Jakarta Concurrency
included in the Web Profile for Jakarta EE 10 and maybe also Core Profile
if it is available in EE10 timeframe.
Main
reasons are;
First
I’m not sure why it isn’t there now as it is pretty principle and therefore
would be of benefit to “Web” applications and REST services.
Second
some of the things we are proposing could then be usable by other specifications
@Asynchronous, @Lock and @Schedule
Third
it would then pave the way of providing some of the capabilities of Session
Beans to all CDI beans and therefore driving @Stateless to be more of a
stereotype.
Thoughts?
Steve
_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev
_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev