To: cu developer discussions <
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Steve Millidge (Payara)"
Sent by: cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 03/24/2020 04:19AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cu-dev] Jakarta ee 9 concurrency project
Hi Fred,
The PR is for the GlassFish project so I’ll wait on the team there to approve.
Do you want to take the update of the TCK in the TCK project as a task. Let me know as if you don’t weant to pick up that I can.
Steve
I've reviewed your PR and it looks good, do you want me to approve it? I ask because I've not yet approved anything in concurrency proj...
Regards,
Fred Rowe
WebSphere Architect for JCA/JDBC connectivity and WAS for IBM i
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Cloud
frowe@xxxxxxxxxx
-----cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: cu developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Steve Millidge (Payara)"
Sent by: cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 03/23/2020 12:46PM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cu-dev] Jakarta ee 9 concurrency project
The Jakarta Concurrency 2.0.0-RC1 implementation (used in GlassFish) is now in maven central
https://search.maven.org/artifact/org.glassfish/jakarta.enterprise.concurrent/2.0.0-RC1/jar
I also have a PR out to integrate this with GlassFish 6.0.0
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/glassfish/pull/22948
Does that help?
Steve
In your last post, you said "Standalone Compatible
Implementation is staged", what CI are you talking about? I know the 1.1 TCK uses gf for it's ci, but I wouldn't consider it standalone. I'm mostly finished with updates to the TCK User's Guide and I'm going to be ready to start testing the TCK changes
soon...
Regards,
Fred Rowe
WebSphere Architect for JCA/JDBC connectivity and WAS for IBM i
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Cloud
frowe@xxxxxxxxxx
-----cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: -----
To: cu developer discussions <cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Steve Millidge (Payara)"
Sent by: cu-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 03/19/2020 11:00AM
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cu-dev] Jakarta ee 9 concurrency project
Hi Fred,
On the Jakarta Concurrency API, Compatible Imp and Spec most things are done or close
to done. However a second pair of eyes reviewing everything for ballot would be appreciated. Also we haven’t started on the TCK so if you want to have a go at that feel free.
Steve
I moved the discussion that had been in the platform ML to here to avoid spamming everyone with cu specific stuff.
In response to Kevin's request for volunteers to help push wave 0 projects thru, I had offered to help with concurrency. Based on your note Steve, the status of concurrency project seems to be:
"API is done.
Standalone Compatible Implementation is staged (I can push that to maven central soon).
First cut of the spec document is done. I'm waiting for our graphic designer to update some of the images.
I haven't done anything on the TCK."
Do you need any help on the spec? Review maybe? Wrt to the TCK, I can start taking a look at it if no one else
is.
Fred Rowe
WebSphere Architect for JCA/JDBC connectivity and WAS for IBM i
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Cloud
frowe@xxxxxxxxxx