Re: [cu-dev] Version Numbers

[Jonathan Gallimore <jgallimore@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think your proposal for 1.1.3 and 2.0 is reasonable. When would we need to decide on the numbering for CU in Jakarta EE 10 by? If there's major new features, I guess I'm more tempted by 3.0. Maybe go with that to define the milestones for now, and if we feel that's too big a number jump closer to the time, I guess we could change it?

Jon

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 9:03 PM Steve Millidge (Payara) <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I was about to create milestones to start and filter issues in GitHub into milestones however I came across the problem of what version numbers.

I am proposing;

1.1.3 - errata or clarification release in javax namespace maybe for jakarta contributed spec doc or anything else we are allowed to clarify in the javax namespace

2.0 Jakarta EE 9 release (namespace change only)

Now I am torn on the next release, some of the ideas are major new capabilities and some are minor do we feel that Jakarta EE 10 should be 3.0 or 2.1?

Steve

_______________________________________________
cu-dev mailing list
cu-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cu-dev

--

Jonathan Gallimore

http://www.tomitribe.com