Re: [cn4j-alliance] Finalizing the MP/EE messaging presentation

[Michael Redlich <mpredli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hey John:

I noticed that three slides (# 10, #11, #12) have been withdrawn, but here are my two cents on this topic:

[a] I'm for keeping slides #10 and #12 because I feel it's important for the Java community to see the WG and technical differences.

[b] while I originally supported slide #11 at the last CN4J meeting that I attended, those differences can be shared with an organization upon expressing interest in joining either WG.

Perhaps an "Interested in Joining?" slide with contact info would be beneficial.

All the best, 

Mike. 

On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 4:03 AM John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I’m not sure if we can come to a consensus on the MP/EE comparison slides. Scott and I have taken two shots at the slide(s). I have withdrawn the slides from the messaging deck in an effort to move forward.

If there is a desire to retain the slides in some form, feel free to comment on this thread.

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
cn4j-alliance mailing list
cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance

--

Code, Test, Write, Cycle, Run, Drink, Sleep ... Repeat

Director, Garden State JUG

Java Queue Editor, InfoQ

About Me

@mpredli

redlich.net/

Laissez Les Bon Temps Rouler

he/him/his