I just tested it on Windows, the build looks good. Thank you!
Marc-Andre
On 3/20/2012 9:16 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
I've pushed build 1022 as M6a and hooked it up to the
milestones repo. The autotools feature has been made optional,
and I did test it on my Mac and it works good.
Doug.
Sigh, good thing the CDT project is more amenable to
respins…
Build underway.
Doug.
Hi Doug
Could we rebuild again for one more fix for bug 374795
( Open Element
dialog (CDT) has text field disabled in 3.8M6)?
It's currently assigned to platform UI, but there's a
fix that takes care of the problem in CDT and platform
is pushing back against having them respin M6.
Thanks,
Pawel
On 03/20/2012 02:09 PM, Vivian Kong wrote:
Yes we checked
in a fix for the failing JUnit tests
Marc-Andre mentioned earlier.
Regards,
Vivian Kong
IBM Eclipse CDT
IBM Canada Toronto Lab
Doug Schaefer
---03/20/2012 04:51:15 PM---I've made the change
and kicked off another build. I noticed Vivian
made a change as well. From: Ser
I've made the change
and kicked off another build. I noticed Vivian
made a change as well.
From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue,
20 Mar 2012 12:11:34 -0700
To: "CDT
General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] M6
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012
at 8:28 AM, Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:
It should definitely
be an optional feature. I would put it in the
C/C++ IDE product though.
Do we need a respin
to pick this up?
Who is making the
change?
-sergey
From: Sergey Prigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CDT General developers list."
<cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012
01:53:37 -0700
To: "CDT
General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] M6
Inclusion of
org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.autotools into the
main org.eclipse.cdt feature seems
counterintuitive to me.
-sergey
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012
at 10:33 PM, Marc-Andre Laperle <malaperle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/19/2012 6:19
PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
They are
included in the org.eclipse.cdt feature (the
main one for the Eclipse C/C++ IDE). I'm not
certain that's correct but it gets us going.
Would you prefer
having it as an optional feature? I don't mind
making the change.
BTW, you
mentioned
org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.autotools. I
though you had renamed them to
org.eclipse.cdt.autotools. Not sure, my
nasty cold right now has me hallucinating a
bit :)
There are multiple
org.eclipse.cdt.autotools.* plugins and one
compatibility plugin,
org.eclipse.linuxtools.cdt.autotools.
I added the missing plugin to the autotools
feature (and it was already in the source
feature).
Marc-Andre
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxhttps://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________ cdt-dev
mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________ cdt-dev mailing
list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|