On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Sergey Prigogin
<
eclipse.sprigogin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Doug Schaefer <
cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I guess the question we should ask, is 4.2 uglier than 3.x? Is it a
>> downgrade or just didn't meet expectations?
>
>
> Much uglier (several other people I know share my opinion). I couldn't stand
> it and went back to 3.8.
>
> -sergey
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:50 PM, xgsa <
xgsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > That is the reason, why I asked about the 3.8 release :)
>> >
>> >
>> > -------- Original message --------
>> >
>> > 4.2 is not only buggy, but the UI looks ugly. Do you know if any UI
>> > designer
>> > work is planned for 4.2?
>> >
>> > -sergey
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Doug Schaefer <
cdtdoug@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> The plan has always to ship the Eclipse C/C++ IDE in Juno with the 4.2
>> >> platform. In theory CDT could be used with both 3.8 and 4.2, but the
>> >> package at
eclipse.org will be 4.2.
>> >>
>> >> Now, there is a subplot to this all. As McQ announced recently, the
>> >> platform UI team is low on staff and this plan is in jeopardy. That's
>> >> why finding these bugs is so important right now, so we can assess how
>> >> good 4.2 is going to be and to see if these issues get addressed (and
>> >> help get them addressed if you have the time/expertise to help). They
>> >> are still committed to 4.2, but I am worried about it.
>> >>
>> >> But, yes, as I stated a few weeks ago here, please use 4.2 as your dev
>> >> environment for CDT master (which will likely be CDT 9 - should make
>> >> that call too I suppose).
>> >>
>> >> Doug.
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 1:20 PM, xgsa <
xgsa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > I cannot find the actual information, will Eclipse 3.8 (with CDT) be
>> >> > released? Or just 4.2?
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks,
>> >> > Anton
>> >> >
>> >> > -------- Original message --------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Marc-Andre is right. E4 currently has some limitations
>> >> >> that affect the CDT quite much. The E4 team is pretty responsive
>> >> >> when we let them know of the issues, so it will be important
>> >> >> to report our issues.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For example, cutomizing perspectives is not supported right now,
>> >> >> which prevents some features of CDT from being accessed altogether:
>> >> >>
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=320478
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >> >>> From:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>> [mailto:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marc-Andre
>> >> >>> Laperle
>> >> >>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:06 AM
>> >> >>> To: CDT General developers list.
>> >> >>> Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Fwd: [epp-dev] Juno M5 packages
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I highly recommend that people test it. I only tested it for a very
>> >> >>> short time and already found 3 issues.
>> >> >>>
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=331444
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Marc-Andre
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 02/02/2012 1:30 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> And here is the link for the Juno M5 C/C++ IDE candidate.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Let me know
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> if you find any serious problems.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Doug.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> >> >>>> From: Markus Knauer<
mknauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >>>> Date: Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:58 PM
>> >> >>>> Subject: [epp-dev] Juno M5 packages
>> >> >>>> To: EPP Developer Mailing List<
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Hi all,
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> here is the second release to be tested, this time it's the
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> EPP build
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> for Juno M5:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>
http://build.eclipse.org/technology/epp/epp_build/juno/downloa
>> >> >>> d/20120202-1517/
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Please test and vote... :)
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Thanks,
>> >> >>>> Markus
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>>> epp-dev mailing list
>> >> >>>>
epp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/epp-dev
>> >> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >> >>>>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >> >>> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >> >>>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >> >>>
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >> >>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > cdt-dev mailing list
>> >> >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cdt-dev mailing list
>> >>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cdt-dev mailing list
>> >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cdt-dev mailing list
>> >
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> cdt-dev mailing list
>>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing list
>
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev