Well, yes. You don’t see it in many places.
From: cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Andrew Gvozdev
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 11:59 AM
To: CDT General developers list.
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT (was RE: What's New in CDT 8.0)
Are we also avoiding "Eclipse" word?
Andrew
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Schaefer, Doug <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It just hit me looking at this doc that we’ve allowed the term “CDT” to creep into the UI. We’ve previously had a policy that we weren’t
going to do that, which is why everything is named “C/C++”. The idea being that the general user who gets CDT commercially won’t know what the term “CDT” means.
Any thoughts on that? We may need to fix this for SR-1, the first release usually adopted by commercial vendors.
Doug.
Yes, I'll take what is on the wiki, maybe rearrange some and put that to CVS.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|