+1 for nuking... or just use conventional weapons to avoid
international scrutiny
Seriously though, cdt-debug-dev hasn't been used in years and its
presence only creates confusion.
Cheers,
Doug Schaefer wrote:
That's a good point. cdt-debug-dev was one of our old
mailing lists. A while ago to help build community momentum I
recommended that we scrap the other ones that were there to get more
topics on the cdt-dev list for all to see. We left cdt-debug-dev, but I
can't remember why other than volume issues.
I'd still like to keep everything on the one list, should we nuke
cdt-debug-dev or do people still fine it valuable to have.
Thanks,
Doug.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Marc Khouzam
<marc.khouzam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
(Forwarded
from cdt-debug-dev, sorry again for the confusion I caused)
Some DSF doc Pawel just checked-in
-----Original Message-----
From: cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:cdt-debug-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Pawel Piech
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 1:14 PM
To: CDT Debug developers list
Subject: Re: [cdt-debug-dev] Fixing some Debug feature-parity bugs
Marc-Andre Laperle wrote:
> I will also look at any bugs on Mac that might come up. Maybe we
> should have a wiki page with who is trying to fix what? Also, is
there
> any documentation on DSF/DSF-GDB that could help me getting more
> familiar with the framework?
I've recently updated the DSF tutorial from EclipseCon 2008 and I've
been meaning to add it to the CDT documentation. I went ahead and added
it with bug 302175.
You should be able to look at it from CVS under
org.eclipse.cdt.docs.isv/guide/dsf/intro/dsf_programming_intro.html, or
get the nighly build tomorrow and search for DSF in the help page.
Cheers,
Pawel
_______________________________________________
cdt-debug-dev mailing list
cdt-debug-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-debug-dev
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
|