[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
What is wrong with bugzilla?
Mike Kucera wrote:
I've always found it ironic how we are building modern state-of-the-art
development tools, but we use archaic tools like CVS and bugzilla to do
it. I feel that CVS has become completely obsolete. I've never used git
but from what I hear its very good. If the rest of the community is
willing to take the lead in making the switch then I am all for it.
+1 for git
Mike Kucera
Software Developer
IBM Eclipse CDT Team
mkucera@xxxxxxxxxx
Inactive hide details for "Schaefer, Doug" ---04/22/2009 11:46:31
AM---BTW, I'm closely tracking the git situation. It is my se"Schaefer,
Doug" ---04/22/2009 11:46:31 AM---BTW, I'm closely tracking the git
situation. It is my sense that git will help us immensely, even dealing
with API changes afte
From:
"Schaefer, Doug" <Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:
04/22/2009 11:46 AM
Subject:
RE: [cdt-dev] git (was:The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BTW, I'm closely tracking the git situation. It is my sense that git
will help us immensely, even dealing with API changes after the release
as Elena mentions (i.e., do it in your git repo and contribute it to the
master later).
So, Chris, I will get you started ;). I'd like to know the CDT
community's opinion on this. One thing that Mike challenged us at the
council meetings at EclipseCon was for a high profile project to step up
and say they would like to move to git before the Foundation would
seriously invest in it. Personally, I'd like the CDT to be one of the
first. What do you think?
Doug.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Chris Recoskie*
Sent:* Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:57 AM*
To:* CDT General developers list.*
Subject:* Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
I agree, but don't get me started :-P
===========================
Chris Recoskie
Team Lead, IBM CDT and RDT
IBM Toronto
Inactive hide details for Jesper Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>Jesper
Eskilson <jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>
*Jesper Eskilson
<jesper.eskilson@xxxxxx>*
Sent by:
cdt-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
04/22/2009 03:40 AM
Please respond to
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To
"CDT General developers list." <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
Re: [cdt-dev] The Great Managed Build API Tooling Fiasco of 2009
Chris Recoskie wrote:
> My first instinct was to perhaps refactor these packages to use the right
> naming convention, but then we lose the CVS history on them all, and this
> affects a lot of classes :-(
You are using an antiquated version-control tool, you know that, right?
The rest of the (open source) world abandoned CVS a long time ago.
--
/Jesper
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@eclipse.org_
__https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev_
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev