Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Feedback on "Multiple Tool Inputs and Outputs design"

Hi Chris,

 

A primary output does need to be specified.  The additional (non-primary) outputs also need to be specified, if they are inputs to other tools.   This would allow these secondary outputs to be “silent” as far as the command line is concerned.  How do your tools handle the primary output?  Does it appear on the command line?

 

Leo

 

From: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Recoskie, Chris
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 7:52 AM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [cdt-dev] Feedback on "Multiple Tool Inputs and Outputs design"

 

>Would it meet your needs if primaryOutput=False and option not specified

>meant to not add the output file to the command line at all?

 

Won’t this mess up the dependency rules then if there is no primary output?  You also need this so that MBS can determine the build artifact.

 

___________________________________________

 

Chris Recoskie

Software Designer

IDE Frameworks Group

Texas Instruments, Toronto

 

Back to the top