[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Indexer inconsistent behaviour
|
Title: Message
So
currently does that mean that K&R style code gets ignored or marked as a
syntax error ?
Tracy
We haven't had
support for K&R style declarations in a CDT release.
Ref:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=45331
I am hoping to get this in for CDT 3.0.
JohnC
www.eclipse.org/cdt
cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 12/03/2004
08:52:55 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing some inconsistent
behaviour in the C-editor while parsing C
> code and displaying red
markers/squiggly lines. Thought I'd post here
> before submitting a
bugzilla because I don't actually know what the
> expected behaviour is,
and also to see if the underlying problem was
> already known and bug
reported.
>
> This occurs with CDT 2.1 RC4.
>
>
Here's the case:
>
> Create a new C project (doesn't seem to
matter whether managed or std )
> If I create a new Source file and add
the following to it:
>
> struct m
> {
> int
n;
> };
>
> int z (b)
> struct t b;
>
{
> return b.y;
> }
>
> I get red error
markers and red squiggles under
> int z(b)
> struct t b;
>
{
>
> If I hold the mouse over this code I get it says it's a
syntax error.
>
> However, if I remove the struct m code (and
sometimes I need to close
> and reopen project to ensure it indexes it)
then the int z code does not
> have any errors marked on it.
>
> This is just a small test case, but I get similar sort of problems
with
> other bits of K&R style code. I'm not sure whether this kind
of code is
> normally marked out or just ignored ? Is this a bug &
if it is, is there
> already a bugzilla report for it ?
>
>
Thanks,
> Tracy Miranda
>
_______________________________________________
> cdt-dev mailing
list
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev