[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Progressing towards 2.0 GA
|
+1 from me Alain. I think that the occasional Eclipse synchpoint
is good to have, but a predictable schedule is better. The fact
that the two co-incided right now was planned. Hopefully we won't
go through that kind of pain until Eclipse 4.0 =;-)
Thomas
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alain Magloire [mailto:alain@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: June 28, 2004 5:25 PM
>To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Progressing towards 2.0 GA
>
>
>>
>> Right now the CDT is being pulled to meet contributing teams product
>> delivery schedules. As more parties get involved, this is
>going to be
>> difficult to manage. My feel is that the CDT needs to have a
>life of its
>> own with a regular and predictable schedule, likely tied
>somewhat to the
>> Eclipse schedule.
>
>I was hoping you would not say thiss 8-). For CDT-2.0,
>locking ourself to Eclipse-3.0
>was ... difficult at best. The problem was the constant
>catchup, not easy to build
>something when the foundation is moving. If we want to put a
>solid product out
>for the CDT users, we need time .. so a little more cushion
>will be benificial.
>
>Of course, IMHO.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cdt-dev mailing list
>cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
>