Re: [cdt-dev] Byte Swizzling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [cdt-dev] Byte Swizzling

From: "Thomas Fletcher" <thomasf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 10:39:05 -0000
Delivered-to: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://dev.eclipse.org/pipermail/cdt-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev>, <mailto:cdt-dev-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Chris Songer <songer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

> 
> The memory view does not do byte swizzling. So if you use the memory
> view to look at a byte array displayed in 4 byte chunks, you get the big
> endian version regardless of the endianness of the target processor.

Without a doubt ... the CDT needs more swizzling capabilities!

Thomas ... Tizzle! Da' longs ain't swizzled, shizzle ma tizzle!


--

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [cdt-dev] Byte Swizzling
  - From: Alain Magloire

References:
- [cdt-dev] Byte Swizzling
  - From: Chris Songer

Prev by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] CDT needs more user feedback =;-)
Next by Date: Re: [cdt-dev] Byte Swizzling
Previous by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Byte Swizzling
Next by thread: Re: [cdt-dev] Byte Swizzling
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs