[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
RE: [cdt-dev] Build model proposal
|
Hi!
Fair enough, but if you are only looking at the model, you are ignoring
the biggest focus of an IDE: the UI. I can get access to C compilers
without an UI already and I don't have to run a JVM to get it.
Contributed toolchains without contributed UI's to configure the tools
are useless in an IDE.
Thanks!
-Chris
At 05:43 PM 12/17/2002 -0500, Matthews, Sky wrote:
You need to separate
the model (APIs to get/set the compiler properties, switches, etc.) from
the UI that provides user view/access to the model. What if we wanted to
build a headless version? :-)
-Sky
-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Songer
[mailto:songer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 5:02 PM
To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx; cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [cdt-dev] Build model proposal
At 04:34 PM 12/17/2002 -0500, Alain Magloire wrote:
>If IToolChain is in the core, it should not have a getTabs().
What's a compiler without the UI to configure the switches for the compiler?
Thanks!
-Chris
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev