re: choice
That's right. I'm hoping this will make adding Chrome/V8 support much easier than having us grovel around constructing something analogous to the XPCOM interface.
With that said, we're busy with doing the necessary JS runtime abstraction and support for Rhino at the moment and as I mentioned awaiting IP approval however this sort of an announcement is great news.
-Simon
Jacek Pospychala ---08/05/2009 01:03:39 PM---hi Simon, yes, I've seen it and looks promising. Do you know what exactly is there
From: |
Jacek Pospychala <jacek.p@xxxxxxxx> |
To: |
AJAX Toolkit Framework discussion <atf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
08/05/2009 01:03 PM |
Subject: |
Re: [atf-dev] Chromium Dev Tools |
Sent by: |
atf-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx |
hi Simon,
yes, I've seen it and looks promising. Do you know what exactly is there at the moment?
To my understanding there's debugging core (remote debugging protocol similar to your work on supporting Rhino, right?) and simple user interface (honestly I were unable to set a breakpoint, however I've read about general Debug, Variables and Expresions support).
With Chromium on board that would make a lot more choice to users: Rhino, Chrome, Mozilla.
Can I assume that it would plug into e4 _javascript_ model similarly to Rhino (and ATF's Mozilla soon)?
Simon Kaegi wrote:
_______________________________________________
atf-dev mailing list
atf-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/atf-dev
|