Re: [wtp-releng] WTP All-in-one

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Naci. 

Yes, there's plenty of time for us to
re-build :) 
if anyone knows of a reason to compile
against latest pre-reqs, but suspect they've 
only changed documentation and similar.
So, I've just been thinking we will "manually" 
edit the download page to point to the
released versions (and, should 
add download.php script at the same
time). 

But, yes, our all-one-one should match
exactly what pre-reqs release. 

Thanks again,

Naci Dai <naci.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-releng-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

06/27/2007 12:38 AM

Please respond to
Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>

To	Webtools releng discussion list <wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[wtp-releng] WTP All-in-one

David,

I have updated and tested the all-in-one script for 2.0.

Also,  there are newer builds for DTP/EMF/GEF/ECLIPSE than the ones
referred on ur build page.  I will use the latest released build for
our 
dependencies to create the wtp-all-in-one once our  voting for the
R-Build candidate is finished.



>
> This is our proposed release.
>
> http://download.eclipse.org/webtools/committers/drops/R2.0/R-2.0-200706260303/
>
>
> The only difference from RC4 is that an about.html file was fixed,
and 
> Dali released a change to correct update manager installs.
>
> There were some other "R-builds" that I deleted, and I reverted
code, 
> since the JavaDoc problem I was trying to fix was
> not so easily fixable after all (for nitty gritty, see 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=179206).
>
> So, Component Leads, please document your approval/disapproval to
> release this version of WTP as our WPT 2.0/Europa Release.
> This should be done by Noon on Wednesday, at the latest, please.
>
> In case you've forgotten :) the official component leads are
>
> Konstantin Komissarchik
> Tim DeBoer
> Nitin Dahyabhai
> Chris Brealey
> Chuck Bridgham
> Raghunathan Srinivasan
> Neil Hauge
>
> Naturally, you are representing your whole component team, so feel
> free to confer with them!
>
> Also, anyone can vote affirmative to show their support! But the 
> Component Leads are primarily responsible
> for standing behind the release, so we'd like to have a public 
> approval documented here on wtp-releng.
>
> Also, any committer can "veto" ... with very good reasons,
of course.
>
> *Reminder of remaining items: *
>
> _http://www.eclipse.org/webtools/releases/2.0/release-notes.php_
> Be sure to document any "release notes" where we feel users
should be 
> warned of some particularly bad bug,
> or an issue (such as migration) that they would want to be aware of
> before they upgrade. Also, if there's a limitation
> that you feel "nearly all users" of a particular function
would hit, 
> you may want to warn them of that.
>
> In general, though, these release notes should be short and brief
and 
> point off to other sources of info (e.g. bugzillas)
> or else no one will read them.
>
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/WTP_Release_Scorecards_20
> Please continue to "fill out" the scorecard, if you haven't
already.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> wtp-releng mailing list
> wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng
>   


-- 
Naci Dai,

eteration a.s. 
itu teknokent ari-1 25
Maslak, Istanbul 34469

+90 (533) 580 2393 (cell)
+90 (212) 328 0825 (phone)
+90 (212) 328 0521 (fax)
http://www.eteration.com/
mailto:naci.dai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
wtp-releng mailing list
wtp-releng@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-releng