Looks great; two minor typos:
- “STF”
à “STP”
- “PHP
Development” à “PHP
Development”
From:
wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David M Williams
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2006
11:24 PM
To: WTP PMC communications
(including coordination, announcements, and Group discussions)
Subject: RE: [wtp-pmc] 2006 WTP
Architecture Block Diagram
Tim, thanks for much for your comments. They were very
helpful, and right on the point, so ... within the limits of my charting
ability ... I implemented all of them.
Well,
except I did leave in the "functional" part of the chart (e.g. SOA, AJAX) but then also
included the name of the project (STF, AJT).
|
"Tim Wagner"
<twagner@xxxxxxx>
Sent
by: wtp-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
02/24/2006 10:19 PM
|
Please
respond to
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination, announcements, and
Group discussions)" <wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
|
To
|
"WTP PMC communications (including coordination,
announcements, and Group discussions)"
<wtp-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
|
|
cc
|
|
|
Subject
|
RE: [wtp-pmc] 2006 WTP Architecture Block
Diagram
|
|
A few suggestions:
- I would consider
just dropping the special color for JSF, under the assumption that
we’re drawing the architecture as it will exist circa 1.5/Callisto.
You could indicate that it will be in a “less than 1.0
release” status somehow if you think that’s helpful.
- I would treat Dali
the same way as JSF, since circa 1.5 it will be in a similar state (WTP
component in tech preview).
- I would move AJAX into the dark
grey (WTP) box, but give it a different color or outline to indicate
“future” status. (Lighter blue color? Dashed outlines?)
- For consistency,
rename: SOA à STP, AJAX à ATF.
- Suggest merging the
downstream projects (STP, PHP, BIRT, TPTP) into a single dark blue box
– I don’t see a need to distinguish between
“current” and “future” w.r.t. our relationship to
them, so I would label them something neutral and symmetric with
“Prerequisite Projects” below…maybe just
“Downstream projects”. (The current labels somehow suggest
that we’re not really doing a good job of integrating with them)
- DTP should go in the
“Prerequisite Projects” box, using whatever “future
indicator” (lighter color and/or dashed outline) you choose for
Dali.
Thanks for working on this!
-t
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
|
