Re: [wtp-dev] M9 version numbering disappointment ;(

[David M Williams <david_williams@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry Max ... we will be addressing
the infamous "PRETTY BAD practice of NOT VERSIONING Eclipse"
post 1.0
as we join the Callisto train. And while
there are "base" bugs and proposals for this, feel free to open
a WTP specific
bug on the 'releng' component to ensure
it gets assigned, gets priority, and gets "fixed" in a way you
would find acceptable. 
We have not, technically, decided exactly
how we will address (if exactly like base Eclipse, or some variant of it).


Reference: 

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=99393

and the resulting proposal, http://eclipse.org/equinox/documents/plugin-versioning.html

"Max Rydahl Andersen" <max.andersen@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: wtp-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

11/27/2005 10:15 AM

Please respond to
"General discussion of project-wide or architectural issues."

To	"wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx" <wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	[wtp-dev] M9 version numbering disappointment ;(

Hi,

Started looking at migrating hibernatetools to WTP 1.0M9 from 0.7 and see
 
to my disappointment
that the version numbers of all plugins already is marked as version 1.0.0
 
even though they clearly
aren't ;(

Meaning we will have the same problems with updatesites as we had with
0.7  
upgraders.

When 1.0 comes out you will not be able to see the difference between a
M9  
plugin and a 1.0 plugin...

I thought this were actually being planned as something that should not
 
happen again...

-- 
--
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen

Hibernate
max@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://hibernate.org

JBoss Inc
max.andersen@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
wtp-dev mailing list
wtp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/wtp-dev