Re: [virgo-dev] Should we request a HIPP for Virgo?

[Violeta Georgieva <milesg78@xxxxxxxxx>]

+1


2013/12/3 Dmitry Sklyut <dmitry@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> +1
>
>
> —
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 9:16 AM, Florian Waibel <fwaibel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> During the last week it was two times that the Virgo builds piled up in Hudson build queue.
>>
>> Lot’s of other projects are currently moving to there own Hudson instance (HIPP - http://wiki.eclipse.org/Hudson#HIPP).
>>
>> Currently a build job “hangs” with a successful build:
>>
>> BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>> Total time: 3 minutes 52 seconds
>> [locks-and-latches] Releasing all the locks
>> [locks-and-latches] All the locks released
>> Archiving artifacts
>> …
>>
>> A HIPP
>>
>> * doesn’t use NFS mounts - no more stale NFS handles,
>> * comes with a newer Hudson version and could use cascading of job configurations (@see https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=390895) and
>> * is allowed to write into the download area and/or the code repositories.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> virgo-dev mailing list
>> virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> virgo-dev mailing list
> virgo-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/virgo-dev
>