| Re: [udig-dev] Eclipse4 testing |
Hi,
I've create a google hangout for Monday 13th of October at 19:00 CEST is
this Ok for you?
Others are naturally free to join
https://plus.google.com/u/0/events/c8vdan4315df4q5mppacvj4rfng
Tom
On 06.10.14 19:43, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Morning Tom,
>
> Would you like to invite me (and any other interested parties) to a
> google hangout (using world clock meeting planner
> <http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?month=10&day=7&year=2014&p1=87&p2=1091&iv=0>
> is a good way to establish a time).
>
> The issues (and test plan) are the same as reported earlier - going
> through walkthrough 1 and walkthrough 2 resulted in two primary issues:
>
> 1) map editor navigational controls (zoom to extent and similar) were
> not displayed in the toolbar. They show up in the menubar, so we are
> probably looking a straightforward migration issues?
>
> 2) user interface getting out of sync with EMF model used for projects /
> maps / layers.
>
> If we can arrange a hangout I would be happy to share a screen and step
> through walkthrough 1 and walkthrough 2 showing where the above two
> issues occur.
>
> Notes:
> - I am using uDig 1.4.0 as a baseline to ensure any regressions are a
> result of migration to Eclipse 4.
> - uDig master has migrated to GeoTools 11.2 - this is an orthogonal
> change with surprisingly few lines of code changed (so chances are
> rebasing your branch against master will be seamless).
>
> --
> Jody
>
> Jody Garnett
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Having returned from JavaOne I'm now available for a testing session
> with Jody so that he can show me areas not yet working and I can finally
> fix them.
>
> Tom
>
> On 06.10.14 10:44, Moser-Spitzenstaetter Ludwig wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > I’m waiting for a result to get uDig started up within our product, but
> > for this i wait for a confimration that it is working correctly (o rat
> > least most of it)
> >
> >
> >
> > So whats the current status?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance
> >
> >
> >
> > *Bakk. Techn. Ludwig M. Spitzenstätter*
> >
> > Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen
> >
> >
> >
> > *Tiroler Landesmuseen-Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H.
> > *Feldstrasse 11a, 6020 Innsbruck
> > Tel +43 512 594 89-425 <tel:%2B43%20512%20594%2089-425> Fax DW
> -440__
> >
> > _l.spitzenstaetter@tiroler-landesmuseen.at_
> >
> > www.tiroler-landesmuseen.at <http://www.tiroler-landesmuseen.at>
> <http://www.tiroler-landesmuseen.at> |
> > www.biooffice.at <http://www.biooffice.at> <http://www.biooffice.at/>
> >
> >
> >
> > *Von:*udig-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:udig-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > [mailto:udig-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:udig-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *Im Auftrag von *Jody
> Garnett
> > *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 28. August 2014 21:13
> > *An:* Tom Schindl
> > *Cc:* uDig project developer discussion
> > *Betreff:* Re: [udig-dev] Eclipse4 testing
> >
> >
> >
> > Note I want to ensure you (like any developer) gets paid - so we can use
> > this test plan against 1.4.0 to ensure we have not misidentified any
> > bugs as regressions brought on by Luna.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Jody
> >
> >
> > Jody Garnett
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
> >
> > Given that we are working across different weeks / availability /
> > timezones we should make a test plan that both you and your customer can
> > sign off on.
> >
> >
> >
> > Normally we use the getting started tutorials as our test plan for each
> > release (these tutorials are specific about what button to push when).
> > It is aimed as an intro but I understand if it requires background
> > knowledge on mapping that makes it difficult to follow.
> >
> >
> >
> > I will find a wiki page and write up my previous email/results in the
> > form of a test plan so we can refer to specific problem steps (sigh).
> >
> >
> >
> > Is there any wiki that you have access to for this purpose? Or should we
> > set up a shared google doc?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Jody Garnett
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Tom Schindl
> > <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>> wrote:
> >
> > Fine with me! If you have steps for reproduction just sent them over and
> > I'll try to reproduce myself ;-)
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On 28.08.14 19:33, Jody Garnett wrote:
> >> That is the week of foss4g so it will need to be after that.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Aug 28, 2014, at 4:00 AM, Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I'm going to be on holiday next week and have to finish of some other
> >>> work items so I guess we need to postpone this to after the my holiday.
> >>> Would Thursday 11th Sep work for you?
> >>>
> >>> Tom
> >>>
> >>>> On 26.08.14 08:37, Jody Garnett wrote:
> >>>> Hello Tom:
> >>>>
> >>>> I would be happy to screen share (Skype or google hangout) and
> >>>> demonstrate the issues I encountered. Please let me know when you are
> >>>> available.
> >>>>
> >>>> I did try and take notes with my initial reports on the data sets and
> >>>> steps used, hopefuly we can retrace these steps together.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jody
> >>>>
> >>>> Jody Garnett
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Tom Schindl
> >>>> <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> > <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I think I'll have time this Friday afternoon to look at some
> of the
> >>>> problems but for that I need a description how I can
> reproduce the
> >>>> problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's naturally also possible that we setup a screensharing
> session so
> >>>> that you can demostrate me the problem.
> >>>>
> >>>> Tom
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 16.08.14 01:24, Jody Garnett wrote:
> >>>>> Just double checking we are sorting out E4 issues with Tom before
> >>>>> upgrading GeoTools. This allows us to be assured the issues are
> >>>> entirely
> >>>>> due to change RCP, EMF, etc... and not due to change of underlying
> >>>>> geotools library.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now we are in position to test udig on E4 platform and
> collaborate
> >>>>> on branch
> >>>>> https://github.com/uDig/udig-platform/tree/luna-support to
> upgrade
> >>>>> geotools.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tom are you able to track that branch? (and possibly issue pull
> >>>> requests
> >>>>> against it?)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I tried to report several issues with the branch that did not make
> >>>> your
> >>>>> list Frank, adding them below with a (+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Next steps (for luna-support):
> >>>>> * testing phase with the current alpha2
> >>>>> (+) ensure "action tools" show up in toolbar
> >>>>> (+) restart issues around map save/load
> >>>>> * fix #E4 upgrade bugs together with Tom
> >>>>> * merge this branch back to master
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Upgrade GeoTools:
> >>>>> (+) Table View fix
> >>>>> * afterwards we can
> >>>>> merge
> >>>>
> https://github.com/uDig/udig-platform/tree/udig-gt-11-snapshot into
> >>>> master
> >>>>> as well
> >>>>> * creating an other Alpha release to test with
> >>>>> * finalize uDig 2.0.0 (with installer that contain JRE and so
> on) -
> >>>>> which will not really be a LocationTech release because of
> IP/CQ stuff
> >>>>>
> >>>>> LocationTech Release:
> >>>>> (+) Change to GeoTools 11.2 (this is the one I am getting
> reviewed for
> >>>>> geogig)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * next goal to make a LocationTech Release
> >>>>> * bundles and features hosted at LoactionTech (maven/p2
> update
> >>>>> sites)
> >>>>> * installers builds we can still provide from
> Refractions based
> >>>>> on Release from LocationTech (sources at github, hosting of
> final
> >>>>> package installers and JRE's at Refractions research)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does this makes sense to you? If so, I would like to create
> >>>> tasks -
> >>>>> bugzilla or still in JIRA? What would yoe prefer
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bugzilla, GitHub or Jira. I am personally terrible at using
> Bugzilla
> >>>>> but perhaps that is just me? I do not mind much either way.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jody
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > udig-dev mailing list
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
> unsubscribe from this list, visit
> > https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/udig-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> udig-dev mailing list
> udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
> unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/udig-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> udig-dev mailing list
> udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/udig-dev
>
_______________________________________________
udig-dev mailing list
udig-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/udig-dev