Re: [udig-dev] JCommon 1.0.16 Questions from IP review

[Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>]

Just to follow up on this one.... the JCommon authors feel their code can get by with out including those three classes (and they are aware of the problem).  Apparently these classes are based on "example code" that was sent to an old java newsgroup back in the day...

How to produce a "subset"? I unzipped the jcommon jar, removed those three classes and zipped the results back up again, giving it a new version number in  the process so we don't get confused. Result is jcommon-1.0.16-CQ7581.jar

Location tech now has a maven repository:

* Nexus: http://repo.locationtech.org/

* Maven repo: https://repo.locationtech.org/content/groups/releases

And to publish these third-party jars we open up a request (see https://locationtech.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25 ).

Jody Garnett

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Question from review of JCommon 1.0.16:

From CQ7581:

Would like to understand if the project can exclude the following files from the jar:

org/jfree/ui/SortButtonRenderer.java

org/jfree/ui/BevelArrowIcon.java

org/jfree/ui/SortableTableHeaderListener.java

So how about it? Not sure what is up with those three files, the SortableTableHeaderListener interface sounds like it would be embedded pretty deep and may break something if not included. 

My understanding is we use JCommon as a requirement for JFreeChart?

Jody Garnett