[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-devel] uDig Community
|
I'm liking it :) Keep it up craig.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:30 AM, Craig Taverner
<craig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Jesse. I have now managed to get the code there and am pleased to see git kept all history. In fact when I uploaded it I thought it failed because the command returned immediately, but when looking at gitorious I was amazed to see all code and all history intact. Git rocks!
And now I also have a wiki page for getting started with Neo4j in uDig. I probably have to go through once more and double check everything, but you are welcome to take a look at:
http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Neo4j_Spatial_in_uDig (I have some screenshots near the bottom, so you can just scroll down if you want to skip the boring, install x,y,z stuff :-)
Hopefully I also get to write a udig blog about this soon :-)
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Jesse Eichar
<jesse.eichar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Created a new repo for you and added you as an administrator.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Jesse Eichar
<jesse.eichar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
As far as I am concerned there is no need to have a single community repository. We can create you a neo4j community repository. But we do want to keep the number of repositories down so that managing them doesn't get to be a problem. So for simple plugins it is probably nice to add to the common repo but for larger ones I think seperate repos are probably a good idea.
Jesse
Hi,
I'm interested in adding the Neo4j catalog plugin to the udig-community project on gitorious, but have a few questions. The code is currently hosted on github at
http://github.com/svzdvd/net.refractions.udig.catalog.neo4j. In my local git branch have renamed the project and packages to the new eu.udig standard since that seems appropriate, and wanted to move the project to udig-community at the same time (2 birds with one stone). I now realize that udig-community is a single git project, which is perhaps not ideal for what appears to be a collection of relatively un-related contributions. This also (probably) makes it quite hard for me to merge my git repository (with history intact) into the udig-community 'mega git repository'.
The main udig project appears to be a collection of sub-projects, which I think makes a lot of sense. The 'uDig Commuity' appears to also be a collection, but with only one sub-project 'udig-community'. This does not make a lot of sense to me.
I see also that I have no commit access to udig-community, even though I appear to have access to udig-platform itself.
So my questions:
- Can I get commit access to udig-community (And 'uDig Community' too)? (I am a member of 'udig-developers' so perhaps adding that group to the udig community is good enough?)
- Can I add the neo4j spatial as a separate sub-project under 'uDig Community' instead of following the 'old' standard of having subdirectories within the udig-community project?
- Can we consider changing the entire udig-community project layout to follow the separate sub-project approach? This is obviously harder to do than the above suggestions, and is not a requirement for me, at all, but seems like a good idea :-)
Regards, Craig
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
