Re: [udig-devel] uDig 1.2.1 ?

[Jesse Eichar <jesse.eichar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> Pros:
> - we have a new feature (wmt)

That one needs some love (see my other email) and testing.

Agreed.  

 

> - we have a new built process to try out (git)
> - we have transitioned to GeoTools 2.7, and a release of GeoTools 2.7 has been made recently that we can use without any extra effort

with the new new packaging choice I am finally bringing the grass
raster format support in udig. I am quite there (for that one I
already had the necessary votes) for grass format, netcdf might take
another while due to the imageio-ext problems I didn't figure out yet.
I also would like to bring the new advanced style editors in the core
of udig. What do you think?

Sounds good to me