Re: [udig-devel] Help wanted for testing

["andrea antonello" <andrea.antonello@xxxxxxxxx>]

Great, let us know, I will drive them through the walktroughs this afternoon.

Andrea

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:35 PM, Jesse Eichar <jeichar.w@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm making up a new build wit these fixes.  I should have it on line in an
> hour or so.
>
> Jesse
>
> On 30-May-08, at 10:17 AM, Tore Halset wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Thanks for applying the patch for UDIG-1389. It works fine, so entering a
>> false username/password pair will only result in a new username/password
>> dialog.
>>
>> Will "PostGIS Experimental" and "MySQL host Experimental" also be included
>> in 1.1?
>>
>> When rendering the wms layer I got the following NoClassDefFoundError and
>> the wms layer got a red cross. I have only testet on OS X.
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Tore.
>>
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]
>> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/media/jai/util/Range
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> net.refractions.udig.project.internal.provider.LayerItemProvider.outOfScale(Unknown
>> Source)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> net.refractions.udig.project.internal.provider.LayerItemProvider.getForeground(Unknown
>> Source)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> net.refractions.udig.project.ui.AdapterFactoryLabelProviderDecorator$LabelProvider.getForeground(Unknown
>> Source)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.viewers.DecoratingLabelProvider.getForeground(DecoratingLabelProvider.java:288)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.viewers.WrappedViewerLabelProvider.getForeground(WrappedViewerLabelProvider.java:130)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.viewers.WrappedViewerLabelProvider.update(WrappedViewerLabelProvider.java:188)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.viewers.ViewerColumn.refresh(ViewerColumn.java:135)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.doUpdateItem(AbstractTreeViewer.java:911)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer$UpdateItemSafeRunnable.run(AbstractTreeViewer.java:97)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.SafeRunner.run(SafeRunner.java:37)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.Platform.run(Platform.java:857)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.ui.internal.JFaceUtil$1.run(JFaceUtil.java:46)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.util.SafeRunnable.run(SafeRunnable.java:199)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.viewers.AbstractTreeViewer.doUpdateItem(AbstractTreeViewer.java:991)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredViewer$UpdateItemSafeRunnable.run(StructuredViewer.java:466)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.SafeRunner.run(SafeRunner.java:37)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.core.runtime.Platform.run(Platform.java:857)
>> 30.05.08 10.12.44 [0x0-0x69069].net.refractions.udig[901]  at
>> org.eclipse.ui.internal.JFaceUtil$1.run(JFaceUtil.java:46)
>>
>> On 30. mai. 2008, at 08.40, Jesse Eichar wrote:
>>
>>> Hello everyone,
>>>
>>> As I mentioned before I have the build process working so that I can
>>> really push out releases quick and easy.  The plan is to make lots of little
>>> bug fixes.  Just very low risk high value fixes and push out many many
>>> releases over the next week and then if everyone is more or less happy I'm
>>> going to stamp it as a uDig 1.1 release.
>>>
>>> So PLEASE help me test this.  If you can provide a patch obviously it
>>> will be more likely to be fixed but if not I will take a look at each report
>>> and decide whether or not it can make the release.  I would also appreciate
>>> it if you can test the fixes I make when I provide a uDig with the fix.
>>>
>>>
>>> So I have applied 3 patches yesterday and made another release.  The
>>> fixes in this release are:
>>>
>>> UDIG-1389 for Tore Halset
>>> UDIG-1383 for Mauro Bartolomeoli
>>> And a WFS fix from Jody.
>>>
>>> The new release is available at:
>>>
>>> http://udig.refractions.net/files/downloads/udig-May29/
>>>
>>> If you could verify that I have correctly fixed the bugs I would greatly
>>> appreciate it.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>>
>>> Jesse
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>>> http://udig.refractions.net
>>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>> http://udig.refractions.net
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
> http://udig.refractions.net
> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>