[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[udig-devel] Re: XDO status and planning
|
Chris Holmes wrote:
What are they doing for ows-3?
I am not sure what part deegree is playing, had a great time talking to
them though. See recent IRC logs for my ideas about an geotools outreach
program (now that GeoAPI has been retasked from such efforts).
And what exactly are you guys doing?
We are being the DSS Client (DSS = Decision Support Services). The hard
part of that is being a GeoVideo service client, chaining up a
FeaturePortrayalService and possibly having to pick up some GML3. We
are the client so this is not the GeoServer work I had hoped for.
We did talk to James and DBlasby about making a spike project similar to
the OSI Framework idea I put forth some time ago. Basically the first
layer of that design where the request/response dispatch system, and a
basic Registry Facade using the udig identifiers rather than the
namespace:typename and datastoreId:::typeName system that GeoServer uses.
Udig uses url#typeName (or url#layerName). Justin is going to be
looking into this, and we had a conference call with James and Dblasby
to figure out the license, technical, and location issues.
license: an escape clause in the GeoServer RequestResponse interfaces so
that LGPL Geotools/Udig stuff can plugin into the system.
location: subversion spike, we can see where it best fits after
technical: mostly summarized above
Jody
