[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tractusx-dev] Committer Elections
|
Hi all,
thanks Sigi for your remarks. Please feel free to ask questions
or start a discussion about an election.
In the Eclipse Handbook there is a chapter about committer
elections [1] and how a nomination should look like [2].
It also says:
"
Committers can change their vote
while the election is in progress. Committers may post
questions about the committer or ask for clarification of the
merit statement in the project’s dev-list, and change their
vote based on what they discover. The merit statement itself
cannot be changed after the election has started.
"
Maybe a good starting point for TractusX?
Best regards
Angelika
[1]
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#elections-committer
[2]
https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#elections-nomination
Am 08.11.22 um 11:54 schrieb Kiermayer,
Siegfried via tractusx-dev:
Hi,
Sorry to be a downer but we haven’t had many
elections so far and I would like to use this nomination as
a short discussion reason:
In my opinion open source contributions should
be small with good PRs and understandable. The commits you
linked were all developed directly on main with basically
‘empty’ git commit messages.
I will sustain from the voting right now, but I
would like to get feedback IF/HOW we handle contributions.
I also do understand that for fast and early
development, small PRs and good commit messages are not
critical. But if that person has no practical experience in
writing for/with opensource, they might not gain it over
time if we don’t discuss this.
Thanks,
Sigi
_______________________________________________
tractusx-dev mailing list
tractusx-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://accounts.eclipse.org
