Re: [tools-pmc] Eclipse LDT and Oxygen

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We dealt with it quickly on the call today. All is good and participation
is approved.

On 2017-04-05, 12:57 PM, "tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of David
Williams" <tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
david_williams@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>As far as I am concerned, we should consider the matter closed, with
>approval -- but, others may expect more.
>
>Here is the history as I know it:
>Wayne proactively petitioned the PC in February:
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/eclipse.org-planning-council/msg0268
>4.html
>
>Since he mentioned " ... supposed to have PMC approval ..." I posted my
>approval in
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03939.html
>as did Roland, in
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03942.html
>Alex gave his approval (with a question) in
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03940.html
>And Doug gave his approval sort asking for the LDT project to say more ...
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/tools-pmc/msg03941.html
>
>My guess is the LDT project does not follow the PMC list, so if PMC
>members had questions, I think they should follow up by posting their
>questions to the ldt-dev list.
>
>Wayne did post one message to that list at
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ldt-dev/msg00086.html
>with one small reply at
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/ldt-dev/msg00087.html
>
>Unless others want more, I think all these message imply "awareness and
>approval" and no need to force more process than that.
>
>And ... perhaps we (our Planning Council Rep :) can participate more
>formally in the future.
>
>If anyone expects more, please say so and follow up as needed.
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>On 04/05/2017 12:06 PM, Doug Schaefer wrote:
>> I would if the LDT gang would feed me what I need to say. I haven¹t been
>> following the issue.
>>
>> Doug.
>>
>> On 2017-04-03, 4:41 PM, "tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
>>Wayne
>> Beaton" <tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> AFAICT, the Eclipse Tools PMC has not actually brought a petition for
>>> Eclipse LDT  to participate in the Eclipse Oxygen simultaneous release
>>> to the Eclipse Planning Council.
>>>
>>> I believe that this is just a technicality, as Eclipse LDT has been
>>> participating in the build since before M4.
>>>
>>> Assuming that I haven't missed something important, can the Eclipse
>>> Tools PMC's Planning Council representative please add this to the
>>>agenda?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Wayne
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Wayne Beaton
>>> @waynebeaton
>>> The Eclipse Foundation
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> tools-pmc mailing list
>>> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>> >from this list, visit
>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
>> _______________________________________________
>> tools-pmc mailing list
>> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>>from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>tools-pmc mailing list
>tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
>To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
>from this list, visit
>https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc