|
As I mentioned in the Linux Tools request, the deadline is RC1. I think the planning council needs to make that more visible as it seems not everyone knows that. I haven’t heard when the Foundation has sent out the materials to the community for review
or when they plan to. If it takes us a week to approve this, you may miss that window.
Would also be nice to have a community friendly New and Noteworthy. I understand you’re a really small project but listing the enhancement request titles doesn’t really give a sense of the important things they need to know about the release.
And yes, you don’t need to wait for the IP Log to ask for our approval. We generally don’t care about that. As a PMC, we just want to make sure the content is well documented and properly minor release (I.e. Has significant new features and has no API
breakage).
Doug.
Am 09.09.2015 um 07:48 schrieb David M Williams:
Not sure what you are asking us to do. a) If this is a minor update, as it appears to be,
Yes, a minor release.
kind of late to be "surprising" us with that when we are nearly done.
Yes, late. But too late?
Note that I wrongly assumed I cannot publish the review before the IP Log is approved. The release itself has been scheduled long ago.
b) worse, your release review materials are basically non-existent. Though, I'll admit, I've had trouble "finding" them before, so maybe am just missing it in that web of web pages.
I think the most important piece of information is the list of bug fixes and enhancements that we provide.
c. The language "coincide with Mars.1" usually means "it is at the same time, but is not part of the Simultaneous Release repository". Is that the case here? How's that to work, since there is a version there, in Sim. Release
repo (right?) as well as some have it already installed, so I suspect those people will be an update, regardless of where it "lives" (right?)
I didn't pay much attention on the word "coincide" when I copied the mail body from someone else. Honestly, I don't think it's wrongly used. We'll release our 1.2.0 version at the same time as the release train releases its Mars.1 version. But
if you insist, please just ignore that word.
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
Can you clarify?
From: Eike Stepper
<stepper@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Tools PMC mailing list
<tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Date: 09/08/2015 11:46 PM
Subject: [tools-pmc] Approval for Oomph 1.2.0 Release Review
Sent by: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dear PMC Members
Please approve the Oomph 1.2.0 release that is scheduled to coincide with Eclipse Mars.1.
https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.oomph/reviews/1.2.0-release-review
The project’s IP Log has been submitted and is awaiting approval.
Cheers
/Eike
----
http://www.esc-net.de
http://thegordian.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/eikestepper
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
|
