[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tools-pmc] FW: [CQ 8776] ANTLR plugin for Eclipse 4.1.3
|
My personal opinion is to go with 1.
For the sake of not having in the git repos smth that's unacceptable to ship.
Alexander Kurtakov
Red Hat Eclipse team
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Elemér Lelik" <elemer.lelik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 11:46:05 AM
> Subject: [tools-pmc] FW: [CQ 8776] ANTLR plugin for Eclipse 4.1.3
>
> Fyi
>
> Please let me have your opinion on this
>
>
> Thank you and best regards
>
> Elemer
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:emo-ip-team@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:45 AM
> To: Elemér Lelik
> Subject: [CQ 8776] ANTLR plugin for Eclipse 4.1.3
>
> http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8776
>
>
> Elemer Lelik <elemer.lelik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Severity|awaiting_committer |new
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #10 from Elemer Lelik <elemer.lelik@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2014-12-11
> 04:44:30 --- Hi Sharon,
>
> thank you.
>
> Well, that's unfortunate.
>
> We will look into a technical solution to replace this dependency with one
> acceptable by the Eclipse Foundation.
>
> Technically , this dependency affects only part of the code :
> the Titan core and the Titan toolset are unaffected, while the Eclipse IDE
> plug-ins depend on antlr during build and runtime.
>
> This means that there might be a number of possible scenarios to continue:
>
> 1) we remove the affected source code from the initial contribution and
> continue with what remains ; the Titan core is self-contained, it does not
> depend on the IDE and can be used without it meanwhile we rework the plug-in
> code and when considered acceptable , we re-submit it as an addition to the
> existing project
>
> In this scenario, users will not be able to use the IDE plug-ins, at least
> initially.
>
>
> 2)we keep the source code of the plug-ins in the initial contribution and
> obtain an approval for it, but we build no binaries for the plug-ins (hence
> antlr will not be distributed )
> meanwhile we rework the code , and resubmit the changes , possibly with a new
> CQ reflecting a new dependency
>
> In this scenario , users will be able to build the IDE plug-ins from the
> source
> code , but they will have to acquire and install the "antlr for eclipse "
> package.
>
>
>
>
> Please let me know if any of these scenarios are acceptable, or there is a
> course of action you would suggest.
>
>
> Please refer this to the PMC as well.
>
>
> Best regards
>
> Elemer
>
>
>
>
> Greetings Elemer;
>
> My apologies for not noticing that you referenced Antlr 2.7.6 when you
> created
> the new attachment. Unfortunately, if any content from version 2.7.6 of
> Antlr
> (generic Antlr) is included, it will be problematic.
>
> From an Eclipse distribution standpoint, only version 3.x and above are
> approved as the Antlr project lead rewrote Antlr v.2.x due to unclear
> provenance.
>
> I'll stand by to hear from you.
>
> Best Regards,
> Sharon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Configure CQmail: http://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the CQ.
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
>
