[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [tools-pmc] PDT minor version in Luna SR2
|
Sorry for the delay in responding ...
I was initially confused because it
seemed you were saying "minor release" but showing only changes
in "service field". So to answer what I think is your original
question, service releases (third field only increments) do not need reviews
or PMC approval.
But all "Minor" (or "Major")
releases do (second field == minor, first field == major).
Now for your second email ... if you
are saying that in Luna SR1 you have version 3.3.x, and in SR2 you'd like
to include a new "minor release" of 3.4.x, then yes, it needs
a "release review" and yes, you can include in Luna SR2, with
some (minor) constraints: It needs to be "mostly done" by SR2
RC0, which means "in the aggregation build" in RC0 and the release
"review documentation" done, and release review scheduled (if
not actually completed before RC0, which is best). You can still fix bugs
between RC0 and Luna SR1, but new features or APIs should be be done, complete,
and mostly bug free by RC0.
The "first part", needing
a release review for "Minor Releases" is a normal Eclipse Foundation
requirement, that is always true. The second part, that if it is in the
"Sim. Release" then it needs to be done by RC0 is a Planning
Council requirement, designed simply to avoid surprises ... to either other
Eclipse projects or adopters.
Hope that clarifies things ... if not,
please ask again.
From:
Dawid Pakuła <zulus@xxxxxxxxx>
To:
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx,
Date:
10/02/2014 08:58 AM
Subject:
Re: [tools-pmc]
PDT minor version in Luna SR2
Sent by:
tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
In my previous mail was a mistake, I
mean PDT 3.4 for Luna SR2. Is this acceptable?
--
Dawid Pakuła
+48 795 996 064
On 29 Sep 2014 at 22:09:00, Dawid Pakuła
(zulus@xxxxxxxxx)
wrote:
Dear PMC,
At begin, thank you for approving me
as a new PDT project leader.
PDT wants to deliver minor releases often
than yearly, similar to EGIT.
We have a plan to prepare minor release
(3.4 [1] - PHP 5.6 support) into Luna SR1 and service release (3.4.1 [2])
into Mars SR0.
3.4.1 may become 3.5.0 if we introduce
new features or ui changes.
Do we need an approval from PMC for each
minor release that isn't delivered with SR0 ? Sorry if it is a stupid question,
but I only found information about "release review" requirement.
[1] - https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/3.4
[2] - https://projects.eclipse.org/projects/tools.pdt/releases/3.4.1
--
Dawid Pakuła
+48 795 996 064_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe
from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
