Re: [tools-pmc] [tm-dev] TM Project Lead

[Doug Schaefer <dschaefer@xxxxxxx>]

We talked about that at the CDT Summit and, yes, he needs to be a committer too. Again, shouldn't be an issue. We can do both votes at the same time.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone on the Rogers network.
  Original Message
From: Oberhuber, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 3:52 AM
To: TM project developer discussions; Tools PMC mailing list; wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx
Reply To: TM project developer discussions
Subject: Re: [tm-dev] [tools-pmc] TM Project Lead


I guess the other question is:

Does the Project Lead have to be a committer himself ?

Note that not being a committer, I see no way how Greg could obtain access to our downloads area, website or promotion of bits to the release train ...

I don't know if there is any precedent of any projects led by a person not being committer ... Tools PMC, Wayne, any input ?

If existing commiters agree, we could probably combine the committer election with a PL election for Greg.

Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind River
direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6


-----Original Message-----
From: tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Greg Watson
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 1:13 AM
To: Tools PMC mailing list
Cc: TM project developer discussions
Subject: Re: [tm-dev] [tools-pmc] TM Project Lead

It sounds like everyone is agreement. The TM committers just need to conduct a vote. Anna or David would you do this?

Regards,
Greg

On Mar 24, 2014, at 3:41 PM, Doug Schaefer <DSchaefer@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> From the PMC perspective, I'm happy with this. I actually think a vote has already taken place, but it should be documented. TM is close to inactive, but I think a lot of us have a vested interested in the terminal at least. Greg mentioned the PTP community has interest in RSE. So let's do what we need to do to keep the project going.
>
> Doug.
>
> ________________________________________
> From: tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [tools-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] on
> behalf of Oberhuber, Martin [Martin.Oberhuber@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 2:29 PM
> To: TM project developer discussions; Tools PMC mailing list
> Subject: Re: [tools-pmc] [tm-dev] TM Project Lead
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> I guess you'll need to call for a formal vote on the tm-dev mailing list.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
> --
> Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Owner - Development Tools, Wind River
> direct +43.662.457915.85  fax +43.662.457915.6
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tm-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Greg Watson
> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2014 1:54 AM
> To: Tools PMC mailing list; tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [tm-dev] TM Project Lead
>
> Hi,
>
> I understand that David Dykstal no longer wishes to be PL of the TM project. I was asked by David Dykstal, Dave McKnight and Anna Dushistova (the active TM committers) to take over the PL job, which I'm willing to do. I'm presuming that the Tools PMC will also need to approve this. Is there anything else that needs to be done?
>
> Thanks,
> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> tm-dev mailing list
> tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc
> _______________________________________________
> tools-pmc mailing list
> tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc

_______________________________________________
tm-dev mailing list
tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev
_______________________________________________
tm-dev mailing list
tm-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-dev