Re: [tools-pmc] Xtend2

[Wayne Beaton <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

FWIW, I got the Ghostbusters reference.

Wayne

On 12/15/2011 11:18 AM, Schaefer, Doug wrote:

I meant cross the streams in a Ghostbusters sense :). I'm just wondering if it's conceivable that a bundle may want to reference both Xtends (the language and the code generator thing). Not sure you got that, but they are two completely different things with the same name.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Milinkovich [mailto:mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 11:04 AM
To: Schaefer, Doug; 'Tools PMC mailing list'; 'Sven Efftinge'
Subject: RE: [tools-pmc] Xtend2

If we're simply moving the component from one place to another, we should
move all Xtend's history with it. So in my naïve view, I'm not sure why this
would be different than any other multi-stream development scenario.

-----Original Message-----
From: Schaefer, Doug [mailto:Doug.Schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
As long as you don't cross the streams, I guess, i.e. a bundle that

extends

Xtend using Xtend...

-----Original Message-----
OK, I must be an idiot. Why won't bundle versioning allow you to
retain the org.eclipse.xtend namespace in its new home?

_______________________________________________
tools-pmc mailing list
tools-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tools-pmc

--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton