[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[tools-pmc] FW: [cobol-dev] plug-in roadmap
|
I think this should have been cc'd to the entire Tools PMC.
-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Ombredanne [mailto:pombredanne@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 7:30 PM
To: 'Development discussions about the COBOL IDE for Eclipse. '
Cc: emo@xxxxxxxxxxx; 'Bjorn Freeman-Benson'; mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxx;
Doug Schaefer
Subject: RE: [cobol-dev] plug-in roadmap
Benbenek, Waldyn J wrote:
>A number of us have been updating the COBOL Tool kit on our own.
>There was a set of fixes offered over the list serve to update to make it
work with 3.2.
>3.3 had a few adjustments as well. The committers have been unwilling to
formally integrate
>the changes and release a new version.
I think this is completely unacceptable from the Cobol project to be un
responsive to the community.
I am escalating that the the Eclipse management.
>Currently, we have our own version running. All we really care about is
the editor
>and we have made a number of fixes to that. The COBOL feature is heavily
oriented
>to Fujitsu COBOL and the committers don't seem to want to change that
either.
At that stage, lets wait and see what can happen, but a project take-over
(or fork within Eclipse) could be a solution.
Would you guys be willing to step up there (ie Amdocs and Unisys) ?
As an Eclipse committer, I have been more than annoyed to see the way this
Cobol project has been led, and its lack of leadership.
Cordially
--
Cheers
Philippe
philippe ombredanne | 1 650 799 0949 | pombredanne at nexb.com
nexB - Open by Design (tm) - http://www.nexb.com
http://easyeclipse.org - http://phpeclipse.net - http://eclipse.org/atf -
http://eclipse.org/vep - http://labs.jboss.org/drools/ -
http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/XULRunner
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cobol-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobol-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Alexander
> Troyanovsky
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2007 11:25 AM
> To: Development discussions about the COBOL IDE for Eclipse.
> Subject: RE: [cobol-dev] plug-in roadmap
>
>
> Thank you all for your replies. It helped me a lot.
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> ------------
> Alexander Troyanovsky
> Portfolio Development Unit - Foundations
> Amdocs System Configurator (ASC), Tiger (ADDM), Fox
> (DB-Schema), Amdocs IDE Raanana, Israel.
> +972-9-7760045 (desk)
> +972-52-6815400 (cell)
> AMDOCS > CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE SYSTEMS INNOVATION
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cobol-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobol-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Benbenek, Waldyn J
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 7:11 PM
> To: Development discussions about the COBOL IDE for Eclipse.
> Subject: RE: [cobol-dev] plug-in roadmap
>
> A number of us have been updating the COBOL Tool kit on our
> own. There was a set of fixes offered over the list serve to
> update to make it work with 3.2. 3.3 had a few adjustments
> as well. The committers have been unwilling to formally
> integrate the changes and release a new version.
>
> Currently, we have our own version running. All we really
> care about is the editor and we have made a number of fixes
> to that. The COBOL feature is heavily oriented to Fujitsu
> COBOL and the committers don't seem to want to change that either.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Waldyn Benbenek
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cobol-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:cobol-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of jd@xxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:55 AM
> To: Development discussions about the COBOL IDE for Eclipse.
> Subject: Re: [cobol-dev] plug-in roadmap
>
> Hello Alexander,
>
> as far as I know the windows plug-in never worked. I am currently
> investigating into the Linux plug-in, but there is incompatibility of
> framework 3.2 and plugin, which is older. You should also know, that
> there is no such thing as a free compiler or debugger for
> COBOL. This is
>
> different from the C++ project. There is not much hope for a
> free version
> of an IDE as you can see from the number of replies. I wonder
> if Eclipse
>
> works for AIX or UX - it is a matter of the manufacturers.
> Which is your
>
> target machine? Also consider different dialects of the ANSI language
> standard. I am working on a COBOL IDE and need some help Till
> works. The
>
> path for Columbo is: a) OS command line tool b) windows IDE
> c) Eclipse IDE
> d) other machines and languages.
>
> Regards
> Jens
> _______________________________________________
> cobol-dev mailing list
> cobol-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cobol-dev
> _______________________________________________
> cobol-dev mailing list
> cobol-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cobol-dev
>
> This message and the information contained herein is
> proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy
> statement, you may review at
> http://www.amdocs.com/email_disclaimer.asp
>
> _______________________________________________
> cobol-dev mailing list
> cobol-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cobol-dev
>
