Dear all,
Any clarification on the meaning of Changeable=frozen for an association end?
Thanks
Marc
From: Flauw, Marc
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 17:35
To: Tigerstripe Users list
Cc: OpenOSS discussion
Subject: Re: [Openoss-discuss] [tigerstripe-users] Read-only association ends
Navid,
What is the semantics of “frozen”?
The set of end points is not really frozen, i.e. invariant. It simply cannot be set directly, only changed internally as a result of another operation.
Best regards
Marc
From: tigerstripe-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tigerstripe-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Navid Mehregani
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 16:37
To: Tigerstripe Users list
Cc: OpenOSS discussion
Subject: Re: [tigerstripe-users] Read-only association ends
Hi Marc,
Have you considered setting the 'Changeable' attribute of an association end to 'frozen'?
- Navid
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Flauw, Marc <Marc.Flauw@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
In RSM I have some navigable associations, where the navigable role is marked as readonly.
However, when I import in Tigerstripe, there is no such property on the aend/zend of an association.
This end will show up as an attribute in the corresponding class and having it readonly is important for the generators.
So how do I do to indicate that a given association end is readonly?
Thanks and regards,
Marc
_______________________________________________
tigerstripe-users mailing list
tigerstripe-users@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/tigerstripe-users