Teresa,
Thanks for the Reply and tring to explain. Experience from Eclipse STEM where I get involved mostly from an i18n perspective, but also as a spokesperson and speaker at Events like EclipseCon tells me this may never happen because the Project once settled into Technology is often afraid or doesn’t have enough time to move, but it’s up to you.
Technology tends to become a bascet case for everything and Nothing. I also lead a Project that is Based there but being used by Science, IoT, LocationTech and other Projects from several different areas I would not be able to shelf UOMo into science or another niche without a drawback to the others, therefore it seems fine, but from the proposal your does not sound like e.g. banks or automotive companies could really use it rather than the scientific or academic sector.
Kind Regards,
Werner
Gesendet von Mail für Windows 10
Von: EMO EMO
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. März 2021 18:55
An: Technology PMC
Betreff: Re: [technology-pmc] New project proposal: Eclipse PASS
Hello Werner,
for the moment we'll keep the project under technology and will see if there is some interest in the future for moving it to science.
To be honest, this sounds a lot like a Science proposal, why was it proposed under Technology and not Science?
The proposal is full of „Center for Open Science.“ so it seems weird they did not propose it to the Science TLP or is „Technology“ still the initial sink before a project may Transfer to Science???
Werner
Von: EMO EMO
Gesendet: Montag, 15. März 2021 18:45
An: Technology PMC
Betreff: [technology-pmc] New project proposal: Eclipse PASS
The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--
The Eclipse Management Organization | Eclipse Foundation