Re: [technology-pmc] Request assistance on CQ 22578 (topbraid shacl work

["Jeen Broekstra" <jeen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Gunnar,

Regarding ClearlyDefined: I did not, I wasn't aware of this tool or that we had adopted this. Looks like I missed a couple of updates.

Stupid question perhaps but how do I "run the IP tool"? There doesn't seem to be any new option to that effect in the project portal.

cheers,

Jeen

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020, at 17:08, Gunnar Wagenknecht wrote:

Hi Jeen,

Thanks for the reminder. I pushed it through. 

However, I found an entry for that particular library in ClearlyDefined:

https://clearlydefined.io/?type=maven&sort=releaseDate&sortDesc=true&name=shacl

This usually means the a CQ is not necessary because the IP tool should vet the dependency just fine.

Did you run the IP tool?

https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#ip-clearlydefined

-Gunnar

-- 

Gunnar Wagenknecht

gunnar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, http://guw.io/

On Dec 8, 2020, at 06:20, Jeen Broekstra <jeen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi PMC,

A co-committer of mine logged a works-with CQ for a library to be used a test-only dependency in RDF4J almost three months ago:

https://dev.eclipse.org/ipzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22578

He has posted several requests for updates, but I get the impression it is somehow "stuck" in the system somewhere. I also noticed that although I can access the CQ with a direct link, it doesn't show up when I search in IPzilla...). 

Could I get someone to take a look please? 

Kind regards,

Jeen

_______________________________________________

technology-pmc mailing list

technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx

To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc