I thought I could let this one slip by :-)
Kristian waited too long to submit the required committer paperwork
and the election timed out. Kristian finally provided the required
paperwork and--rather than ask the project to rerun the
already-positive election--I asked webmaster to roll back the
timeout and the election ended up back in the PMC approval required
state.
I did start to type this in my welcome message but decided that it
would add confusion where none was required. It never occurred to me
that the voting summary would be more confusing.
HTH,
Wayne
On 01/17/2012 10:11 AM, Eric Rizzo wrote:
Hmm,
something weird happened with this nomination. Portal doesn't shed
any light; any ideas?
On 1/17/12 12:01 AM, portal on behalf of emo wrote:
technology PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of
voting for
Kristian Rosenvold's Committer status on the technology.aether
project. As
a PMC member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through
your My
Foundation portal page:
http://portal.eclipse.org/
Kristian Rosenvold was nominated by as follows:
Vote summary: 0/0/0 with 0 not voting
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
--
Wayne Beaton
The Eclipse Foundation
Twitter: @waynebeaton
  |
