[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [technology-pmc] Technology Project Charter
|
That description seems to apply. What do you see as the issue with using
such wording?
- Konstantin
-----Original Message-----
From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 9:41 AM
To: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [technology-pmc] Technology Project Charter
I agree with removing the "incubator stream" and "not ready for
production" tone.
I'd rather not, however, define Technology as the "place to go when
nobody else will take you" :-) (even though I may have described it
using similar terms in the past). Maybe we can come up with something
better.
Thanks,
Wayne
On 04/14/2011 12:35 PM, Konstantin Komissarchik wrote:
> I think we need to revisit the incubator stream concept and all of the
> wording that implies that the Technology Project cannot be a home for
mature
> and stable projects. Since incubators are now scattered everywhere, I
> suggest replacing incubator stream with "projects whose scope doesn't fit
> under another top-level project". Some of these can be in incubating
state,
> some in matured, etc.
>
> The scope section needs similar changes. The current charter paints
> everything under Technology as not ready for production, which hasn't been
> the case for a while now, yet I have heard a number of projects raise
> objection at taking dependency on projects located in Technology purely
> based on the unstable/experimental perception. We need to fix that.
> Statements on process maturity (as in scope section) should be a function
of
> a given sub-project, rather than inherited from Technology.
>
> Are research and education streams even utilized? Have these been subsumed
> by eclipse labs, github, etc?
>
> - Konstantin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:technology-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Wayne Beaton
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 11:17 AM
> To: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [technology-pmc] Technology Project Charter
>
> It's probably time to update the charter.
>
> http://www.eclipse.org/technology/technology-charter.html
>
> Any initial thoughts, PMC members?
>
> Wayne
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
>
> _______________________________________________
> technology-pmc mailing list
> technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
