[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Ralf Sternberg
|
I hope I'm not being too anal or pedantic about this, but...
I notice in the bug report that several of the contributors are listed
as only contributing 1%. Is it necessary/prudent/appropriate to grant
them committer status for such a small contribution?
I hesitate to ask (because most of the names are well-known and
already committers on other projects and there is probably not any
practical harm), but if we want to make our committer approval process
consistent we should be open and conscious about this kind of situation.
Eric
On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:10 PM, portal on behalf of emo wrote:
technology PMC Members,
This automatically generated message marks the completion of voting
for
Ralf Sternberg's Committer status on the technology.examples
project. As a
PMC member, you can approve or disapprove this vote through your My
Foundation portal page:
http://portal.eclipse.org/
Ralf Sternberg was nominated by Wayne Beaton as follows:
Ralf is a contributor to the new Toast example contribution (Bug
289164);
he requires committer access to continue this excellent work once this
contribution is committed to Eclipse CVS (CQ 3536).
* https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=289164
Vote summary: 5/0/0 with 0 not voting
+1 Wayne Beaton
+1 Scott Lewis
+1 Benjamin Muskalla
+1 Heiko Seeberger
+1 Remy Suen
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc
